Skip to main content
List building/disco-like

Disco-Like

Lookalike company discovery. Give it 3-10 seed domains you know are a good fit; it returns hundreds of similar companies by domain, industry, and business characteristics. Useful for expanding from a small known-good list to a much bigger TAM without manual research.

Version
1.0
License
MIT
Format
SKILL.md

Full skill documentation

Inside this skill

The complete operating guide, including the workflow, formulas, examples, and guardrails your agent will follow.

Lookalike company discovery. Give it 3-10 seed domains you know are a good fit; it returns hundreds of similar companies by domain, industry, and business characteristics. Useful for expanding from a small known-good list to a much bigger TAM without manual research.

When to use

  • You have 3-10 customer domains you love, want "more like these"
  • You want to expand a small client list into a full TAM
  • You have an ICP description but don't want to manually build Prospeo filters
  • Competitive / adjacent-market expansion

When NOT to use

  • You need PEOPLE, not companies (use Prospeo or Blitz after this)
  • Your ICP is extremely narrow or nascent (<5 seed examples exist)
  • Budget is tight — DiscoLike charges per call + per record; see cost section

Two search modes

Mode A — Seed domains (most common)

npx tsx scripts/discover.ts --domains "clay.com,apollo.io,outreach.io" --country US --limit 500 --out lookalikes.csv

DiscoLike finds companies with similar characteristics (industry mix, employee count range, business type, tech stack) to your seeds.

Mode B — Natural-language ICP

npx tsx scripts/discover.ts --text "B2B SaaS companies selling outbound sales software to RevOps teams" --country US --out lookalikes.csv

Uses DiscoLike's text matching. Less precise than seeds, but useful when you don't have named comparables.

Hybrid mode

npx tsx scripts/discover.ts --domains "clay.com" --text "outbound automation" --country US --out lookalikes.csv

Combines both — starts from seeds, expands via text semantics.

Negation (exclude existing customers / competitors)

npx tsx scripts/discover.ts \
  --domains "clay.com,apollo.io" \
  --negation-domains "yourcompany.com,yourbigcustomer.com" \
  --country US \
  --out lookalikes.csv

Always include your own domain + existing customers + known-unfit competitors. Saves enrichment cost downstream.

Inputs

  • DISCOLIKE_API_KEY (env) — from DiscoLike dashboard
  • Either --domains or --text (at least one required)
  • Optional: --negation-domains, --country, --limit, --max-companies

Outputs

CSV with columns: domain, company_name, industry, headcount_range, headcount, location_country, location_state, location_city, linkedin_url, description, source

All rows have source=discolike so you can mix with other list-builder outputs without collisions.

Cost

  • $0.10 per API call + $2.00 per 1,000 records returned
  • Default page size: 100 per call
  • A 500-company discovery = ~5 calls + 500 records ≈ $1.50
  • A 10,000-company discovery ≈ $10 + $20 = $30

Compare to Prospeo, which charges per export. DiscoLike is typically cheaper per company-discovered but more expensive per enriched contact (DiscoLike gives companies, not people).

Required step: Qualify with /icp-prompt-builder

This is a required step. Do not skip it.

Before pulling 5,000 companies, run DiscoLike on a small sample (50-100), then invoke /icp-prompt-builder:

  1. Evaluate which of the 50 are actually good ICP fits
  2. Refine your ICP description / negation list based on what DiscoLike returned
  3. Only then scale to 5,000+

Why required: DiscoLike lookalike results are only as good as your seed domains. If 80% of the first 50 are wrong, you need to change seeds, not pay to pull more. At $0.10/call + $2/1K records, a wrong-seeded 10K pull costs $20-$30 in DiscoLike fees AND cascades into wasted email-finder fees downstream. Qualifying the first 50 catches bad seeds before they become expensive.

Recommended flow

  1. /icp-onboarding → nail down seed companies (your best 5 customers)
  2. /disco-like --domains="seed1,seed2,..." --limit=100 --out=sample.csv → sample run
  3. /icp-prompt-builder → score the sample, tune ICP prompt
  4. If sample quality is high, scale: /disco-like ... --limit=5000 --out=full.csv
  5. /blitz-list-builder --domains-file=full.csv → find decision-makers at each
  6. /email-waterfall → fill in emails
  7. Upload to Smartlead

API details (reference)

Base URL: https://api.discolike.com/v1

Auth: x-discolike-key header

Endpoints:

MethodPathPurpose
GET/count?domains=X&text=YTotal matching companies (before paying to pull)
GET/discover?domains=X&text=Y&country=Z&limit=100&offset=0Paginated lookalike results
GET/bizdata?domain=XDetailed data for a single domain

Data returned per company:

  • domain, name, description
  • industry_groups (weighted dict — script takes top industry)
  • employees (range string like "51-200")
  • address (country, state, city)
  • social_urls (script extracts LinkedIn company URL)

Rate limit: Conservative — script throttles at 5 concurrent, 10 req/sec. No 429s observed on normal runs.

Common gotchas

  • Seed domains must be clean bare domains. clay.com works, https://clay.com/ doesn't.
  • Text mode is fuzzier than you think. "Outbound sales" returns SaaS, agencies, consultancies — broad. Tighten with seeds.
  • No people data. DiscoLike is company-level. Always chain with Blitz or Prospeo for contacts.
  • Non-US coverage varies. US has deepest data. EU/APAC coverage is thinner; count may be misleading.
  • Check the count FIRST. Before paying for 10,000 records, run /count to confirm the universe actually has 10,000. Many narrow ICPs top out at 500-2000.

Scripts

  • scripts/discover.ts — main search + CSV output
  • scripts/count.ts — pre-check universe size before paying
  • scripts/bizdata.ts — single-domain lookup

What to do next

Run /icp-prompt-builder on your 50-company sample (required step above). Then either:

Or wait: if the 50-sample ICP fit was poor (<40% matches), don't scale. Change your seed domains and re-run with better inputs.

Related skills